ISLAMABAD: Senator Kamran Murtaza and MNA Aliya Kamran have moved privilege motions in Parliament seeking an inquiry into an alleged incident in which around 40 armed men visited two family homes in Quetta’s Samungli Housing Scheme, kicked doors, took photographs of the properties and caused fear among women and children.
The motions relate to an incident reported on November 4, 2026. The parliamentarians have asked who sent the visitors, whether they belonged to any government or law enforcement agency, and under what legal authority they approached or entered the residential premises.
In her privilege motion submitted to the National Assembly, Aliya Kamran, MNA from NA 326, stated that the alleged incident affected her fundamental rights as well as her privileges as an elected member of Parliament. She alleged that the action was connected with political differences with the government and amounted to an attempt to intimidate and harass her.
According to the account placed before Parliament, around 40 people first reached House D70, described as a private residence in the Samungli Housing Scheme. They allegedly kicked the main gate, climbed the boundary walls and took photographs of the house. The motions also state that photographs were taken of the electricity meter installed outside the residence.
The commotion reportedly brought neighbours out of their homes. Some students in the locality allegedly attempted to film the visitors on their mobile phones, but were stopped from recording videos.
The group later allegedly proceeded to another family residence, House D22, in the same housing scheme. The motions state that persons accompanying police personnel kicked the doors, creating fear among family members, including women and children.
Senator Kamran Murtaza’s motion also refers to the alleged visit to both houses. It states that when family members asked the personnel to disclose their identity, they refused to give their names or show any identification. They reportedly claimed that they had come on the instructions of law enforcement agencies.
Aliya Kamran’s motion says the visitors failed to establish their identity or produce any legal reason or permission for entering the residential premises. She stated that the incident created fear, distress and insecurity for the family.
The motion further says that Aliya Kamran’s younger brother, Adnan, was present at the family home along with women and children. He allegedly asked the visitors to identify themselves, but they did not provide the required details. The group reportedly left after a large number of people gathered at the scene.
In her motion, Aliya Kamran referred to Articles 9, 14 and 15 of the Constitution, concerning security, human dignity and freedom of movement. She argued that any attempt to intimidate an elected representative over her political views would also undermine the independence of Parliament and the ability of its members to perform their duties freely.
She requested the National Assembly Speaker to admit the motion, refer it to the Assembly’s Privileges Committee and call for an explanation from the relevant authorities. She asked that the committee determine who the visitors were, under whose authority they went to the houses and what legal grounds, if any, supported their actions.
Aliya Kamran also sought measures for the safety of her family and protection of the privacy of their homes.
Separately, Senator Kamran Murtaza has sought action through the Senate, asking that his privilege motion be sent to the relevant committee so the matter can be examined and a report presented before the House.
